Allen Edwards
Hereford, United Kingdom 9/23/2004 5:45:43 AM
In referance to UFO SLIDESHOW (cropped enlargements)of many UFO photos show some kind of electrical-forcefield disturbances around UFO objects. TOM GREY TORONTO,ON. CANADA If anyone else cares to comment on my observations please comment. Sept. 23, 2004.
Tom GreyG
Toronto, Canada 9/22/2004 7:51:55 AM
In referance to UFO SLIDE SHOW UFO photos - (cropped enlargements) show some kind of disturbance around UFO......In my opinion diturbance could be some kind of electrical or force-field surrounding object.
9/22/2004 7:40:13 AM
The universe is too vast. How many planets are out there? Sceintist are discovering new stars almost all the time. How can we be the only life form in the Universe? How is that even close too correct. The wolrd we live in has alot of problems. How can any sensable human being sit there and say we, as a planet are not drawing attention to ourselves? The peolple who lead the human race, and cause problems for others draw attention to the planet we live on, and if there is life, more inteligent than ours, that race or planet doesnt want us causing problems for them. Maybe they have a peacful lifestyle, or a perfect living condition. They sure do not want somebody intruding and destroying their life and planet(s). I myself have not seen any U.F.O., but maybe i will before i die. Or hopefully before the human race as we know it, destroys ourselves.
Jeffrey
9/21/2004 11:31:35 PM
tough to say. it's hard to believe (given the vast expansion of the universe) that were the only ones that developed intelligent life. With that being said however, i have never seen a shred of credible evidence supporting the common ufo theory.
i want to believe because there is a part of me that really thinks a discovery of this magnitude could tie up a lot of 'unsolved mystery' about our origination, purpose . . .etc. but i digress, as always, back to the skeptic that says 'make me believe', show me proof (undeniable).
bastian
houston, tx 9/21/2004 11:31:30 AM
lalala
bob
portland 9/21/2004 8:46:50 AM
yes the really are first i thought that they were just optical illution or air force secret projects but now we cannot neglect their presence.
vinay
alwar,rajasthan,india 9/20/2004 1:10:37 AM
yes,i belive.....i wana buy a dvd...can u help??
jason goldthorpe
u.k. 9/19/2004 10:31:13 AM
The longer I ponder this, the more persuaded I become that the phenomenon of UFO
presence/alien reality has been emerging in human consciousness and experience
in an inverse relation to the general level of fear or panic that it would possibly incite.
What I mean is that the widely reported sightings are gradually becoming almost
commonplace. Someone, for example, says he saw a UFO. How many people today
would dryly ask "That's news?" While others would dismiss it as some crackpot making
claims or someone misinformed reporting on weather conditions or a hoax. It
(whatever it is) simply does not seem to create the stir that it did in the past. Recent reports
are now describing the triangles as "brazen" as if to suggest they acknowledge this
lack of excitement demonstrated by Earth people at their nonetheless marvelous
aerial showings.
Ho hum. Perhaps the lackluster response that most people display nowadays is like another way
of saying "Come on, already. Show us something we can sink our teeth into. Enough
with the big tease."
Another detail has come to my mind concerning the terms of reference to the UFO
presence/alien reality. Are our words of reference actually keeping pace with the events?
What is it that we mean when we say "Identified" or "Unidentified"? For example, someone sees
something in the air that is peculiar but stereotypic for a UFO. Now, let us pause on those words.
Peculiar? Yet stereotypic? Something doesn't fit in the same peg hole there. But then, if not "peculiar" per say, in that context, how is it then "Unidentified"? Someone SEES something in the air, perhaps along with hundreds or even thousands of other people, and the thing is in the air for several days or weeks at a time. (Referring to Arizona Triangle sighting some years ago.) It is photographed, and
video films were made of it. Yet what do we mean by "Unidentified"? Do we mean we don't know the names and telephone numbers of people who are operating the craft? But now, is that the same old meaning for unidentified as we had at first become familiar with?
Detail #2. There were no first responders scrambled out from the military to go dog the thing down.
Quite the different response lately from what we would have witnessed 50 years ago.
So now it seems even the military is bored with chasing the ubiquitous
"well known by now" unidentified (?) flying objects. Perhaps the policy has shifted from
"I've got to have one of those."and running them off in the effort to "Let's see
what else it does."
I just had to throw in these 2¢. It didn't seem that anyone else has brought it up.
Buz V.
San Antonio, Texas, USA 9/19/2004 4:03:08 AM
Yes..............................Have never witnessed one but believe those who have.
