Reader's Comments
cori
3/6/2011 2:08:36 PM

awsome

Andrew skitch
5/9/2010 4:37:35 AM

I cant belive i used to camp in Rendlesham forrest and all that time i didnt know aliens crah landed there. I only live a few minutes from Rendleshem


11/21/2007 4:47:37 PM

your story was ruined by the over use of exclamation marks!!!!!!!!

Michael
7/20/2004 12:46:11 PM

The Government Underestimates the Intelligence of its Constituents

First of all, it is not necessarily likely that a "Russian" spy-satellite would fall right on its target--any assertion like that appeals only to simple-minded individuals who automatically presume proximity with relevancy. It is just a likely that a Russian satellite would have been brought to Earth in some other innocuous location--a location which would not be sensitive to scrutiny, like the alleged weapons depot at the base in Rendlesham.

Like the Roswell incident in 1947, the sheer proof of the magnitude of the event is reflected by the preposterously stupid explanations forwarded by the government officials. I stand by this claim as absolute fact.

Michael
7/20/2004 12:44:50 PM

First of all, it is not necessarily likely that a "Russian" spy-satellite would fall right on its target--any assertion like that appeals only to simple-minded individuals who automatically presume proximity with relevancy. It is just a likely that a Russian satellite would have been brought to Earth in some other innocuous location--a location which would not be sensitive to scrutiny, like the alleged weapons depot at the base in Rendlesham.

Like the Roswell incident in 1947, the sheer proof of the magnitude of the event is reflected by the preposterously stupid explanations forwarded by the government officials. I stand by this claim as absolute fact.

Michael
7/20/2004 12:42:32 PM

First of all, it is not necessarily likely that a "Russian" spy-satellite would fall right on its target--any assertion like that appeals only to simple-minded individuals who automatically presume proximity with relevancy. It is just a likely that a Russian satellite would have been brought to Earth in some other innocuous location--a location which would not be sensitive to scrutiny, like the alleged weapons depot at the base in Rendlesham.

Like the Roswell incident in 1947, the sheer proof of the magnitude of the event is reflected by the preposterously stupid explanations forwarded by the government officials. I stand by this claim as absolute fact.

 

 

 

Ads help to support this site: